guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#lusolabs-v-m-span-et-al
This is the start of #lusolabs-v-m-span-et-al channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 08:25 a.m.
New Case
Case Type
Civil
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 06:51 p.m.
Brenda Cornwallis
Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-04 08:44 a.m.
Certificate of Ministerial Act

The Prothonotary's Office hereby certifies that it has assigned this case channel to Judge InsertReality in pursuance of its ministerial duties.

cc: @mike_bn
mike_bnmike_bn used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 09:37 a.m.
Case Modified
@mike_bn has added @isaac to the case channel.
mike_bnmike_bn used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.
Case Modified
@mike_bn has added @Luso to the case channel.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.
your complaint is accepted
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.
summon defendants
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 11:08 a.m.
Hi
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 12:17 p.m.
@mike_bn Whres the summons format
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 12:37 p.m.
look at orher cases
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 12:37 p.m.
other
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
have 3rd party serve(edited)
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
@Brenda Cornwallis take notice
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
Ok anyone in particular
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
named defendants
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
you are suing the agency as well
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
Stan runs m-span
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
so direct a summons to the sgo
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
i'm directing it to him
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.
ok
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 03:52 p.m.
What Why is this going to the sgo @mike_bn
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 04:52 p.m.
Both summoned by ccso
Brenda Cornwallis
Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-04 05:14 p.m.
@mike_bn Sis M-Span is a media company
Brenda CornwallisBrenda Cornwallis
@mike_bn Sis M-Span is a media company
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:15 p.m.
right but they are a moreso state media company
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:15 p.m.
at least in og mf they were
mike_bnmike_bn used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.
Case Modified
@mike_bn has added @stanlabs to the case channel.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.
@stanlabs hi
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.
ill give u uh
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.
2 days to find counsel
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:17 p.m.
or identify your coubselo
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:17 p.m.
counsel
mike_bnmike_bn
right but they are a moreso state media company
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.
????
mike_bnmike_bn
at least in og mf they were
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.
?????
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.
Your honor-
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:22 p.m.
Wait I'm sorry
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:22 p.m.
You bitch, M-SPAN has never ever been affiliated with the state in any capacity whatsoever in every State game we've operated in
mike_bnmike_bn
2 days to find counsel
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:25 p.m.
You bitch, no need, I will be representing myself and M-SPAN pro se
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:26 p.m.
And I will respond to the civil complaint right now; I deny every allegation regarding me and M-SPAN
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:34 p.m.
This is unruly language
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:34 p.m.
We move for contempt
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:37 p.m.
You bitch, the plaintiffs request for contempt against me has no grounds; your chambers rule in chamber-info stipulates that I can call your bitchness "whatever [my] lego heart desires."
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:41 p.m.
OK. thanks
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:41 p.m.
Recinded
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.
You bitch, the plaintiff just spoke to me directly
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.
I move for contempt
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.
? I Was speaking to the judge
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.
I just spoke to him again
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.
All of this is being spoken to the judge
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:43 p.m.
You bitch, please ask the plaintiff why he "thanks" you when you haven't said anything
isaac
isaac 2025-04-04 06:43 p.m.
Thanks for your service insert
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:44 p.m.
You bitch, upon hearing the clarification from the plaintiff, I rescind my request.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.
pkay
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.
deadline for response is
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.
call it April 9th at or before 11:59 pm est
stanlabsstanlabs
And I will respond to the civil complaint right now; I deny every allegation regarding me and M-SPAN
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.
is this not good enough
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.
You bitch
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:55 p.m.
I deny all claims
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:57 p.m.
I will submit a paper version soon, just note I don't have computer access
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:05 p.m.
okay u have time
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.
dont say mean stuff
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.
pls
mike_bnmike_bn
okay u have time
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.
Submitted
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
Because then I’m forced to make you pay money or put you in jail
mike_bnmike_bn
dont say mean stuff
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
I'm not?
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
That's how I refer to you, you bitch
stanlabsstanlabs
Submitted
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
I actually think this complies besides calling me a bitch
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
Ok fine
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
Don’t call me that I’m trying to be nice
stanlabsstanlabs
Submitted
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, your honor
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.
I could’ve put you in jail by now
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
I'm sorry, Your Honor
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
But I’m nice
stanlabsstanlabs
Submitted
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
OK, you need to cross out the bitch part and put the full case number and then I’ll accept it
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
Add another Dorito to
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
too
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
I already ate them
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
one for me
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
WhTs the fill case number
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.
Open another bag
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.
CV-158-25
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.
@Brenda Cornwallis can u accept that
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.
as a response
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.
for filing purposes
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.
I’m inclined to
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.
@mike_bn Respextfully submitted your honor
mike_bnmike_bn
Open another bag
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.
That's 150 calories, your honor
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.
I'm not doing that
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:57 p.m.
Hello I have gotten an attorney
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:57 p.m.
He will file notice of appearance soon
stanlabsstanlabs
He will file notice of appearance soon
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-04 10:50 p.m.
sweet
mike_bnmike_bn
@Brenda Cornwallis can u accept that
Brenda Cornwallis
Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-05 03:53 a.m.
Certificate of Ministerial Act

The Prothonotary's Office has e-filed the response to the Trello card assigned to this action.

cc: @mike_bn @stanlabs @isaac
Brenda CornwallisBrenda Cornwallis
Certificate of Ministerial Act The Prothonotary's Office has e-filed the response to the Trello card assigned to this action. cc: @mike_bn <@33748646663041843...
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-05 10:28 p.m.
thx
isaac
isaac 2025-04-06 03:35 p.m.
Will we be moving to pre-trial? @mike_bn
isaacisaac
Will we be moving to pre-trial? @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-06 04:46 p.m.
@stanlabs do u have a attorney coming
mike_bnmike_bn
@stanlabs do u have a attorney coming
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-06 04:55 p.m.
Yes Your Honor
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-06 04:56 p.m.
He's been very busy working a minimum wage job (broke people amiright :🤢:)
mike_bnmike_bn used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.
Case Modified
@mike_bn has added @Evexom to the case channel.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.
@Evexom r u counsel
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.
Yes. Soonest I can have my NOA filed will be tomorrow around 6:30pm PST
EvexomEvexom
Yes. Soonest I can have my NOA filed will be tomorrow around 6:30pm PST
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:04 a.m.
dont sweat it
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.
@Evexom do u want to file an amended reply?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.
answer *
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.
Yes
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-07 09:18 p.m.
@mike_bn will be filed later than expected. My family wants to go out for dinner
isaac
isaac 2025-04-07 10:48 p.m.
Counsel for the Plaintiff moves to
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-07 11:38 p.m.
kk
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-07 11:38 p.m.
so ordered
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-08 02:40 a.m.
@mike_bn Your honor, objection
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-08 02:40 a.m.
Defendendant moves to
isaac
isaac 2025-04-08 07:34 p.m.
Counsel for Plaintiff moves for a Motion to Compel the Defense to produce an amended reply to the civil complaint.

cc: @stanlabs @mike_bn @Evexom
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-08 07:40 p.m.
You’ll get it
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-08 07:40 p.m.
Probably tonight
isaac
isaac 2025-04-10 06:13 p.m.
Hello we move for another Motion to Compel the Defense to produce an amended reply to the civil complaint.

cc: @stanlabs @mike_bn @Evexom
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-10 06:13 p.m.
Hi!
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.
HI SOME OF US HAVE JOBS
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.
ILL TRY TO GET IT BEFORE I WORK TODAY
isaac
isaac 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.
Sir you are literally online on discord 24/7
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:23 p.m.
it has been 6 says since u were added labs
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:23 p.m.
@Evexom sir reply by tonight
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.
its not hard
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.
just admitted and denied
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.
you have leave to file a counterclaim if u so wish just get the reply in
mike_bnmike_bn
it has been 6 says since u were added labs
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-10 07:54 p.m.
And I worked 5 days and was out of town for the other ! It’ll be done though
EvexomEvexom
And I worked 5 days and was out of town for the other ! It’ll be done though
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-10 10:36 p.m.
I work too but cmon man
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-11 03:40 a.m.
@mike_bn @isaac
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-11 03:13 p.m.
Your honor, I hope this 2 page 200-300 word response finally made you realize why it was so utterly necessary to have 6 days to file it
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-11 03:13 p.m.
stanlabsstanlabs
Your honor, I hope this 2 page 200-300 word response finally made you realize why it was so utterly necessary to have 6 days to file it
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:27 p.m.
next time attach my portrait to it
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:27 p.m.
@Evexom
mike_bnmike_bn
next time attach my portrait to it
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-11 03:30 p.m.
No thanks, that'd be a violation of LR4(1)
EvexomEvexom
No thanks, that'd be a violation of LR4(1)
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:32 p.m.
Um DNC
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:32 p.m.
Ligma
isaac
isaac 2025-04-11 09:26 p.m.
Can we move to pre-trial @mike_bn
❌1
isaacisaac
Can we move to pre-trial @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:47 p.m.
pre trial to end
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:47 p.m.
apr 21
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:48 p.m.
discovery demand letters due apr 14
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:48 p.m.
discovery due apr 19
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-15 06:33 p.m.
@Evexom @isaac reminder
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-15 06:33 p.m.
reminder
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-15 06:43 p.m.
send yo shit @isaac
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-15 06:43 p.m.
/s/Fliply27
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:26 p.m.
SRRY
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:27 p.m.
Verbal Motion to Withdraw as Counsel @mike_bn
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:27 p.m.
Pls
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:33 p.m.
Actually withdrawn Srry ur highness
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:34 p.m.
Terms have changed
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:51 p.m.
Initial Disclosures:
isaac
isaac 2025-04-15 07:52 p.m.
cc: @Evexom @mike_bn @stanlabs
isaacisaac
Initial Disclosures:
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-15 07:56 p.m.
I object
stanlabsstanlabs
I object
Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-15 08:01 p.m.
shutup
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-15 08:24 p.m.
I move to contempt my attorney for humiliating me
isaac
isaac 2025-04-21 12:59 p.m.
Hi is pretrial end @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.
thank you for getting my title right
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.
@stanlabs @Evexom end of today for discovery
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.
ill let it slide
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:05 p.m.
but after today u wont be submitting
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.
@isaac @Luso HI I AM DISCLOSING EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT I HAD WITH MX. INSERT
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.
BCC: @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.
I Concur
isaac
isaac 2025-04-21 10:57 p.m.
Plaintiff and his Attorney Thank the Defense for bringign up this ex-parte communication
cc: @stanlabs
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:02 p.m.
Defense is disclosing prior ex-communication
cc: @isaac
bcc: @turntable @stanlabs @Code3Patrick
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:03 p.m.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:04 p.m.
@Brenda Cornwallis Please add this ex-communications to the trello card---I have already paid the required fees
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.
Thank you for that
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.
I almost forgot
isaac
isaac 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.
Plaintiff and his Attorney Thank the Defense for bringign up this ex-parte communication
cc: @stanlabs
isaac
isaac 2025-04-22 01:01 p.m.
Hello Is pretrial over now @mike_bn
isaacisaac
Hello Is pretrial over now @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-22 02:53 p.m.
Yes
mike_bnmike_bn used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.
Case Modified
@mike_bn has added @leoisnoob to the case channel.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.
@leoisnoob hi my lovely clerk
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.
can u schedule this for trial?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.
i will be free all of next week for a discord trial
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:23 a.m.
@Evexom @isaac guys
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.
Hi
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.
can we not just summary this
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.
if you guys want a trial ill give it to you
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:25 a.m.
the dispute here is lawfulness
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:25 a.m.
not an issue of material fact
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:28 a.m.
i have 2 other trials about to happen and this case was filed later
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:28 a.m.
so it will be pushed to the back of the line
isaac
isaac 2025-05-01 07:41 a.m.
Hi
isaac
isaac 2025-05-01 07:44 a.m.
Yea
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.
@Evexom @isaac do parties both agree to summary?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.
can one just file a short motion
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.
DEALING WITH A MONITOR THAT WENT KAPUT ILL REVIEW EVERYTHING AND FIGURE THIS OUT SHORTLY
EvexomEvexom
DEALING WITH A MONITOR THAT WENT KAPUT ILL REVIEW EVERYTHING AND FIGURE THIS OUT SHORTLY
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:30 a.m.
WHY ARE WE YELLING
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-02 12:30 a.m.
BECAUSE IM BROKE AND I REALLY DONT WANT TO DROP MORE MONEY ON A MONITOR
isaac
isaac 2025-05-02 07:39 a.m.
Sorry I can't motion
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.
I hate my attorney
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.
@mike_bn Hi I file for summary judgement
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.
files
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:40 p.m.
View attached image:
stanlabsstanlabs
I hate my attorney
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:30 p.m.
I hate you too dw
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.
@Evexom @isaac okay
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.
do both parties agree upon summary judgement?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.
im just gonna review your pleadings and decide
mike_bnmike_bn
do both parties agree upon summary judgement?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-07 10:46 p.m.
Yea
isaac
isaac 2025-05-07 10:46 p.m.
cc: @stanlabs
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-07 10:58 p.m.
ok
EvexomEvexom
ok
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-07 11:00 p.m.
yes or no
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-07 11:00 p.m.
IDOT
mike_bnmike_bn
IDOT
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-07 11:01 p.m.
Thoughts on my environmental disaster?
mike_bnmike_bn
yes or no
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-07 11:01 p.m.
yes :D
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-07 11:34 p.m.
Arbitrator Insertreality
isaac
isaac 2025-05-08 05:55 p.m.
Hello @mike_bn When can expect a decision
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-09 11:26 a.m.
@mike_bn Hello Honorable
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-09 11:27 a.m.
When can a decision be expected?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-09 12:40 p.m.
Idk bro I’m stuck here
isaac
isaac 2025-05-09 10:16 p.m.
THANK YOU SIR
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.
@isaac Im prepared to dismiss this
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.
You never stated a claim to which relief can be granted
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.
What is the claim?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:18 p.m.
I did not see a tort
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:19 p.m.
The claim is that
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:19 p.m.
So its
mike_bnmike_bn
What is the claim?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.
The claim is that luso was fired
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.
For submitting a complaint against m-span
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.
No no not the facts
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.
but the categorization of the facts which give rise to a claim
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.
wrongful termination isnt a tort
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
unless im mistaken
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
Ur mistaken.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
Ur not mistaken
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
Cc @stanlabs
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
please correct me
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
if i am
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
Can you make the plaintiff pay my lawyer fees
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
stan stfubitch
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
:😁:
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.
The tort is wrongful termination
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
And its a tort cause i said it was a tort in the civil complaint
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
So
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Is it common law
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Yup.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
I would say to the judge
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
It is.
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Ok
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
It's common law sir
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
???
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Oh sorry
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Are you crosstalking to me?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
Sorry judge
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.
right but
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:25 p.m.
Actually WRONG!
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.
i hate our senate
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.
a lot
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.
AGREED.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.
What's the problem
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.
okay you are right
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.
in that case i am entering a finding in favor of the plaintiff
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.
THANK you.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.
i think it is more likely than not that the defendant was fired as a result of their report against defendant
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.
cc @isaac @Evexom
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
ISNT THAT SECTION RELATING TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
Agreed, thank you establishing JUSTICE in this CRIMINAL community
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
HOW MUCH DO I HAVE TO PAY YOU
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
We will be calculating the payment in a moment
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
is it against gov
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
i fucking hate this senate
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
???
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
hoold on
mike_bnmike_bn
i fucking hate this senate
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
Don’t we all
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.
@isaac what is your reply
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
It is against ALL peoples
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
im withdrawing my finding for a second
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
It says PEOPLE not government employees
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
THE LAW WAS CLEARLY INTENDED FOR GOV EMPLOYEES
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
the title is "Public Employment"
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
the titles doesnt matter
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
the state registar determines that
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
the senate doesnt make the titless
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
the rest of the sections are tailored towards gov
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
so that would be krabzs job
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.
@Evexom reply?
mike_bnmike_bn
the rest of the sections are tailored towards gov
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
that is the state registars choice
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
well i need to consider legislative intent
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
the senate didnt decide that
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
or lawmaker intent
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
since krabz isnt senate but still a lawmaker
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
Is there a bill
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
we can look at?
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
To see for any congressional findings and stuff
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.
the law is quite literally titled the "Public Servants Act"
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
Ok your honor I did some digging
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
Inaugural laws of the state
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
Your Honor
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
employee rights is for PUBLIC SERVANTS
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
If you look at 4 M.S.C 7 ' 5107
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
DEFINED IN STATE LAW
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
IT STATES
mike_bnmike_bn
@Evexom reply?
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
At work rn will have one once im off. If you make these ppl shut up so I can find this
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
no person employed by the GOVERNMENT may create, maintain, orchestrate, lobby for, or organize a union
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
THAT section specifically talks abotu government employees
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.
the rest of the sections merely say people
stanlabsstanlabs
Click to see attachment.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:32 p.m.
But the law which defines employee rights SPECIFICALLY states its given to public servants
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:32 p.m.
Just because the senate is retards and felt the need to add "government" to one statute doesn't mean it's applies to EVERY employer in the state(edited)
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:33 p.m.
that is the other statutes not specifying government employees
stanlabsstanlabs
Click to see attachment.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:37 p.m.
@krabz Why are DEFINITIONS not in the state code btw
stanlabsstanlabs
@krabz Why are DEFINITIONS not in the state code btw
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.
That was supposed to be the original PSA. I believe mandatorymorale codified what you are reading; but it was removed when we added the (now present) edited Ridgeway PSA.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.
Hence why that entire Google document is just for reference.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.
Hope this helps!
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 07:08 p.m.
Ok so the definition is out of the window @mike_bn
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-10 07:08 p.m.
However legislative intent CLEARLY indicates these laws apply to public servants
isaac
isaac 2025-05-10 08:20 p.m.
The definition is not encoded therefore does NOT apply
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 09:52 p.m.
Legislative intent
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-10 09:52 p.m.
Okay I’ll write a ruling on this with case law
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 12:46 a.m.
@Evexom Fuckass lawyer do you have anything to say
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 12:47 a.m.
Shut up I been napping
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 12:47 a.m.
Bum
mike_bnmike_bn
Okay I’ll write a ruling on this with case law
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 01:05 a.m.
When can we expect this sir
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:38 a.m.
ok so what do you need a response to Mr Jew? @mike_bn
EvexomEvexom
ok so what do you need a response to Mr Jew? @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-11 10:29 a.m.
If the law in which plaintiff is suing for only applies to gov employees
mike_bnmike_bn
If the law in which plaintiff is suing for only applies to gov employees
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:17 p.m.
The statute was made for public employment, nothing suggests that it is for private employees. If you try and use the Plaintiff argument that it also applies to the private sector is just a joke
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.
Im going to write a ruling on this
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.
Thank you senate for once again a great piece of legislation
EvexomEvexom
The statute was made for public employment, nothing suggests that it is for private employees. If you try and use the Plaintiff argument that it also applies to the private sector ...
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.
What suggests it was made for public employment
isaacisaac
What suggests it was made for public employment
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:19 p.m.
The fact that the statute was enacted by the Public Servants Act and not the Private Servants Act?
EvexomEvexom
The fact that the statute was enacted by the Public Servants Act and not the Private Servants Act?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 01:21 p.m.
I dont see any public servants act anywhere
isaacisaac
I dont see any public servants act anywhere
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 01:21 p.m.
mike_bnmike_bn
Thank you senate for once again a great piece of legislation
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:16 p.m.
surprisingly this was the senates fault
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:16 p.m.
this is Central Authority legislation
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:45 p.m.
@mike_bn
Sir Jew, it is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when the legislature uses different language in different parts of a statute or act, that choice is intentional. The Supreme Court explained that “[w]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” See Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983), This principle directly applies here. Where the legislature has explicitly limited certain statutes to “government employees” or “public servants” and used more general terms like “employees” or “persons” in others, the only reasonable inference is that it meant to draw a distinction in coverage.

The statutory language at issue is clear and unqualified. As the Supreme Court held in Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249, 253–54 (1992), “when the words of a statute are unambiguous, then, this first canon [of statutory construction] is also the last: ‘judicial inquiry is complete.’” The legislature did not include any language restricting the statute’s applicability to the public sector, and it is not the role of the Court to read such a limitation into the text.

The omission of qualifying language especially when such language appears in related statutes does reflect a deliberate legislative choice. This Court should give effect to that choice and recognize that the protections or obligations imposed by the statute apply broadly, including to private sector employees.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:53 p.m.
if the court recognizes and accepts this arguement, then the court, by the Mayflower State Constitution, must declare several provisions of the law to be unconstitutional(edited)
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:53 p.m.
stanlabsstanlabs
if the court recognizes and accepts this arguement, then the court, by the Mayflower State Constitution, must declare several provisions of the law to be unconstitutional(edited)
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
no? it simply interprets the statue according to its PLAIN language
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
as the legislature intended
stanlabsstanlabs
Click to see attachment.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
The bill in question is the Public Servants Act
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
STOP CROSST ALKING TOME
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
without limiting the scope beyond what is written
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
STOP CROSS TALKING TO ME
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
STOP TALKING TO ME
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
??????
isaacisaac
no? it simply interprets the statue according to its PLAIN language
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
Yes
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
And I'm saying if we do that
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
Then under the one-subject rule Mayflower follows
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.
the provisions would be unconstitutional
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.
since it goes outside the subject of public servants and into the prviate sector
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.
any challenge to the laws constitutionally can be addressed SEPARATELY
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.
it is the courts duty to interpet the statue faithfully before reaching constitutional questions
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.
Ok I'm just putting it on the record!
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:56 p.m.
Thanks hoe
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:56 p.m.
@Evexom Idiot any thoughts?
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-11 02:57 p.m.
@mike_bn Can we get a gag order on these two until you publish your ruling?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 02:57 p.m.
?????? Sir I made a VALID and LEGAL argument above before i was cross-talked by stanlabs
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.
Ur cross talking rn
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.
I would say to the judge
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.
In reference to Filturaes
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-11 04:37 p.m.
Everyone who cross talks is getting raped
isaac
isaac 2025-05-11 05:34 p.m.
AGREED, SIR.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 07:19 p.m.
@mike_bn Hello order please
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 07:20 p.m.
What's the et—
isaac
isaac 2025-05-13 07:20 p.m.
A!
stanlabsstanlabs
What's the et—
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.
Kys
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.
Jk
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.
Let me do stuff
mike_bnmike_bn
Kys
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:08 p.m.
Recuse urself
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.
Also you're a hypocrite btw
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.
Ur chamber rules explicitly say i can call you whatever i want
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.
But when I kept on calling you bitch, you said you would contempt me?
stanlabsstanlabs
But when I kept on calling you bitch, you said you would contempt me?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-14 01:07 a.m.
I felt mysterious
isaac
isaac 2025-05-14 08:38 p.m.
HELLO ALL
🇭2
🇮2
😃2
isaacisaac
HELLO ALL
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-15 10:49 p.m.
The defense would like to motion to the court that the case be dismissed w/ prejudice as a form of sanction against the plaintiff. As seen above, by saying "ALL," the plaintiff is cross-talking to the defense.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-16 10:32 a.m.
@isaac @Evexom im going to do ruling soon
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-16 10:32 a.m.
thank god u have no right to speedy
mike_bnmike_bn
@isaac @Evexom im going to do ruling soon
isaac
isaac 2025-05-16 03:00 p.m.
We invoke our right to a speedy trial
isaac
isaac 2025-05-16 03:00 p.m.
And to a JURY TRIAL
isaac
isaac 2025-05-16 03:01 p.m.
cause u are BIASED
isaacisaac
cause u are BIASED
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-16 03:07 p.m.
Are you trying to say the Jews run the media?
EvexomEvexom
Are you trying to say the Jews run the media?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-16 03:09 p.m.
Sir Stanley Labson is a White Ukranian Man
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-17 09:57 p.m.
@mike_bn HELP
isaac
isaac 2025-05-17 09:59 p.m.
May it please the court,
isaac
isaac 2025-05-17 09:59 p.m.
I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-18 09:50 p.m.
@mike_bn
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-18 09:50 p.m.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-19 08:35 a.m.
isaac
isaac 2025-05-20 10:42 p.m.
@mike_bn Hello me and @stanlabs (specifically him) would like to know when we will be getting a ruling
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:58 p.m.
Filturaes, as Insert has said before, we do not have a right to a speedy trial
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:58 p.m.
—And that's a good thing.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.
We should trust the Honorable Judge Insertreality to take into factor all of the details of the case
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.
And in order to do so, we must give him the time that he needs to research and deliberate.
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.
You can't rush justice @isaac.
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-20 11:25 p.m.
@mike_bn Mr Bergstein this ruling was promised to us 3000 years ago
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-21 01:56 a.m.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-21 01:58 a.m.
Tomorrow
isaac
isaac 2025-05-21 03:24 p.m.
GREAT
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-21 10:45 p.m.
@mike_bn NOT GREAT!
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-21 10:45 p.m.
TODAY IS TOMORROW
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.
Bruhhhh
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.
Ok u want paper ruling
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.
Or I can just tell you my decision
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.
Paper is halfway done
mike_bnmike_bn
Or I can just tell you my decision
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-22 12:30 p.m.
Tell decision now
mike_bnmike_bn
Or I can just tell you my decision
isaac
isaac 2025-05-22 02:39 p.m.
Paperless if it's in our favor
isaac
isaac 2025-05-22 02:39 p.m.
Cc: @stanlabs
isaacisaac
Paperless if it's in our favor
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-22 04:41 p.m.
Hey have you noticed how he hasn't given a paperless ruling
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-22 04:41 p.m.
Not looking good for you :😁:
isaac
isaac 2025-05-22 04:54 p.m.
Ok paperless in general
isaac
isaac 2025-05-22 04:55 p.m.
cc: @mike_bn
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-23 02:08 a.m.
Hey jewstein when ruling @mike_bn
EvexomEvexom
Hey jewstein when ruling @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:12 a.m.
I’m on another vacation so I don’t have PC
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:13 a.m.
However I do agree with the defense that these statutes are designed for government employees
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:13 a.m.
That’s what the legislature intended here
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:14 a.m.
So I’m going to dismiss this
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:14 a.m.
@Evexom @isaac
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:15 a.m.
If you want to wait for a paper ruling I can do it when I’m back
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 10:53 a.m.
It's ok
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 10:59 a.m.
Oh god
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 10:59 a.m.
@isaac Settle out of court?
stanlabsstanlabs
@isaac Settle out of court?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 12:23 p.m.
? It's dismissed idiot
isaacisaac
? It's dismissed idiot
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:37 p.m.
Idiot you just turned down free money
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:37 p.m.
@mike_bn Can the plaintiff pay the defense's attorney fees
stanlabsstanlabs
@mike_bn Can the plaintiff pay the defense's attorney fees
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 05:52 p.m.
? Floppy is a horrible attorney
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 05:53 p.m.
We the Plaintiff request $200,000 for lost wages or we are suing again @stanlabs
isaacisaac
We the Plaintiff request $200,000 for lost wages or we are suing again @stanlabs
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:57 p.m.
REMINDER:

The doctrine of respondeat superior and the doctrine of negligent entrustment are simply alternative theories by which to impute an employee's negligence to an employer. Under either theory, the liability of the principal is dependent on the negligence of the agent.
stanlabsstanlabs
REMINDER: The doctrine of respondeat superior and the doctrine of negligent entrustment are simply alternative theories by which to impute an employee's negligence to an employe...
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 06:04 p.m.
? What does this have to do with this
isaacisaac
? Floppy is a horrible attorney
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-23 06:51 p.m.
kys
Evexom
Evexom 2025-05-23 06:51 p.m.
(keep yourself safe)
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 07:22 p.m.
i demand CIVIL. yes. CIVIL contempt
isaacisaac
? Floppy is a horrible attorney
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 07:27 p.m.
Aren't you the attorney that's going after your fellow colleague Vohesia?
stanlabsstanlabs
Aren't you the attorney that's going after your fellow colleague Vohesia?
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 07:37 p.m.
? Mandatorymorale?
stanlabs
stanlabs 2025-05-23 07:37 p.m.
No Vohesia
isaac
isaac 2025-05-23 07:38 p.m.
Who is that
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-05-25 05:20 p.m.
@Brenda Cornwallis u can dismiss w prej
Brenda CornwallisBrenda Cornwallis used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-25 05:25 p.m.
Initial transcript w/ images failed. Retrying without the images..(edited)
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-25 05:25 p.m.
isaac
isaac 2025-05-25 05:54 p.m.
@mike_bn WE ARE APEPALING!
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 08:30 p.m.
Unable to upload transcript. An unknown error has occurred.
Exported 430 messages