lusolabs-v-m-span-et-al

Mayflower District Court

#lusolabs-v-m-span-et-al

This is the start of #lusolabs-v-m-span-et-al channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 08:25 a.m.

New Case

Lusolabs v. M-SPAN, et al.

Case Type

Civil

clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 06:51 p.m.

Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-04 08:44 a.m.

Certificate of Ministerial Act

The Prothonotary's Office hereby certifies that it has assigned this case channel to Judge InsertReality in pursuance of its ministerial duties.

cc: @mike_bn

mike_bn used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 09:37 a.m.

Case Modified

@mike_bn

has added @isaac to the case channel.

mike_bn used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.

Case Modified

@mike_bn

has added @Luso to the case channel.

mike_bn 2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.

your complaint is accepted

mike_bn 2025-04-04 09:38 a.m.

summon defendants

isaac 2025-04-04 11:08 a.m.

Hi

isaac 2025-04-04 12:17 p.m.

@mike_bn

Whres the summons format

mike_bn 2025-04-04 12:37 p.m.

look at orher cases

mike_bn 2025-04-04 12:37 p.m.

other

isaac 2025-04-04 03:45 p.m.

@mike_bn

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ja_njParl6pRGwKVB7ZNPtji8G6lCP3i/view?usp=sharing

mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

have 3rd party serve(edited)

mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

@Brenda Cornwallis

take notice

isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

Ok anyone in particular

mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

named defendants

mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

you are suing the agency as well

isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

Stan runs m-span

mike_bn 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

so direct a summons to the sgo

isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

i'm directing it to him

isaac 2025-04-04 03:50 p.m.

ok

isaac 2025-04-04 03:52 p.m.

What Why is this going to the sgo @mike_bn

isaac 2025-04-04 04:52 p.m.

Both summoned by ccso

Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-04 05:14 p.m.

@mike_bn

Sis M-Span is a media company

Brenda Cornwallis

@mike_bn Sis M-Span is a media company

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:15 p.m.

right but they are a moreso state media company

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:15 p.m.

at least in og mf they were

mike_bn used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.

Case Modified

@mike_bn

has added @stanlabs to the case channel.

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.

@stanlabs

hi

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.

ill give u uh

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:16 p.m.

2 days to find counsel

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:17 p.m.

or identify your coubselo

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:17 p.m.

counsel

mike_bn

right but they are a moreso state media company

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.

????

mike_bn

at least in og mf they were

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.

?????

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:21 p.m.

Your honor-

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:22 p.m.

Wait I'm sorry

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:22 p.m.

You bitch, M-SPAN has never ever been affiliated with the state in any capacity whatsoever in every State game we've operated in

mike_bn

2 days to find counsel

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:25 p.m.

You bitch, no need, I will be representing myself and M-SPAN pro se

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:26 p.m.

And I will respond to the civil complaint right now; I deny every allegation regarding me and M-SPAN

isaac 2025-04-04 06:34 p.m.

This is unruly language

isaac 2025-04-04 06:34 p.m.

We move for contempt

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:37 p.m.

You bitch, the plaintiffs request for contempt against me has no grounds; your chambers rule in chamber-info stipulates that I can call your bitchness "whatever [my] lego heart desires."

isaac 2025-04-04 06:41 p.m.

OK. thanks

isaac 2025-04-04 06:41 p.m.

Recinded

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.

You bitch, the plaintiff just spoke to me directly

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.

I move for contempt

isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.

? I Was speaking to the judge

isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.

I just spoke to him again

isaac 2025-04-04 06:42 p.m.

All of this is being spoken to the judge

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:43 p.m.

You bitch, please ask the plaintiff why he "thanks" you when you haven't said anything

isaac 2025-04-04 06:43 p.m.

Thanks for your service insert

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:44 p.m.

You bitch, upon hearing the clarification from the plaintiff, I rescind my request.

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.

pkay

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.

deadline for response is

mike_bn 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.

call it April 9th at or before 11:59 pm est

stanlabs

And I will respond to the civil complaint right now; I deny every allegation regarding me and M-SPAN

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.

is this not good enough

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:54 p.m.

You bitch

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:55 p.m.

I deny all claims

stanlabs 2025-04-04 06:57 p.m.

I will submit a paper version soon, just note I don't have computer access

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:05 p.m.

okay u have time

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.

dont say mean stuff

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.

pls

mike_bn

okay u have time

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:08 p.m.

Submitted

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

Because then I’m forced to make you pay money or put you in jail

mike_bn

dont say mean stuff

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

I'm not?

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

That's how I refer to you, you bitch

stanlabs

Submitted

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

I actually think this complies besides calling me a bitch

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

Ok fine

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

Don’t call me that I’m trying to be nice

stanlabs

Submitted

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, your honor

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:09 p.m.

I could’ve put you in jail by now

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

I'm sorry, Your Honor

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

But I’m nice

stanlabs

Submitted

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

OK, you need to cross out the bitch part and put the full case number and then I’ll accept it

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

Add another Dorito to

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

too

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

I already ate them

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

one for me

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

WhTs the fill case number

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:10 p.m.

Open another bag

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.

CV-158-25

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.

@Brenda Cornwallis

can u accept that

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.

as a response

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.

for filing purposes

mike_bn 2025-04-04 07:11 p.m.

I’m inclined to

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.

@mike_bn

Respextfully submitted your honor

mike_bn

Open another bag

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.

That's 150 calories, your honor

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:16 p.m.

I'm not doing that

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:57 p.m.

Hello I have gotten an attorney

stanlabs 2025-04-04 07:57 p.m.

He will file notice of appearance soon

stanlabs

He will file notice of appearance soon

mike_bn 2025-04-04 10:50 p.m.

sweet

mike_bn

@Brenda Cornwallis can u accept that

Brenda Cornwallis 2025-04-05 03:53 a.m.

Certificate of Ministerial Act

The Prothonotary's Office has e-filed the response to the Trello card assigned to this action.

cc: @mike_bn @stanlabs @isaac

Brenda Cornwallis

Certificate of Ministerial Act The Prothonotary's Office has e-filed the response to the Trello card assigned to this action. cc: @mike_bn <@33748646663041843...

mike_bn 2025-04-05 10:28 p.m.

thx

isaac 2025-04-06 03:35 p.m.

Will we be moving to pre-trial? @mike_bn

isaac

Will we be moving to pre-trial? @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-04-06 04:46 p.m.

@stanlabs

do u have a attorney coming

mike_bn

@stanlabs do u have a attorney coming

stanlabs 2025-04-06 04:55 p.m.

Yes Your Honor

stanlabs 2025-04-06 04:56 p.m.

He's been very busy working a minimum wage job (broke people amiright

)

mike_bn used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.

Case Modified

@mike_bn

has added @Evexom to the case channel.

mike_bn 2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.

@Evexom

r u counsel

Evexom 2025-04-06 05:55 p.m.

Yes. Soonest I can have my NOA filed will be tomorrow around 6:30pm PST

Evexom

Yes. Soonest I can have my NOA filed will be tomorrow around 6:30pm PST

mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:04 a.m.

dont sweat it

mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.

@Evexom

do u want to file an amended reply?

mike_bn 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.

answer *

Evexom 2025-04-07 01:05 a.m.

Yes

Evexom 2025-04-07 09:18 p.m.

@mike_bn

will be filed later than expected. My family wants to go out for dinner

isaac 2025-04-07 10:48 p.m.

Counsel for the Plaintiff moves to

mike_bn 2025-04-07 11:38 p.m.

kk

mike_bn 2025-04-07 11:38 p.m.

so ordered

stanlabs 2025-04-08 02:40 a.m.

@mike_bn

Your honor, objection

stanlabs 2025-04-08 02:40 a.m.

Defendendant moves to

isaac 2025-04-08 07:34 p.m.

Counsel for Plaintiff moves for a Motion to Compel the Defense to produce an amended reply to the civil complaint.

cc: @stanlabs

@mike_bn

@Evexom

Evexom 2025-04-08 07:40 p.m.

You’ll get it

Evexom 2025-04-08 07:40 p.m.

Probably tonight

isaac 2025-04-10 06:13 p.m.

Hello we move for another Motion to Compel the Defense to produce an amended reply to the civil complaint.

cc: @stanlabs

@mike_bn

@Evexom

stanlabs 2025-04-10 06:13 p.m.

Hi!

Evexom 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.

HI SOME OF US HAVE JOBS

Evexom 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.

ILL TRY TO GET IT BEFORE I WORK TODAY

isaac 2025-04-10 06:14 p.m.

Sir you are literally online on discord 24/7

mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:23 p.m.

it has been 6 says since u were added labs

mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:23 p.m.

@Evexom

sir reply by tonight

mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.

its not hard

mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.

just admitted and denied

mike_bn 2025-04-10 06:24 p.m.

you have leave to file a counterclaim if u so wish just get the reply in

mike_bn

it has been 6 says since u were added labs

Evexom 2025-04-10 07:54 p.m.

And I worked 5 days and was out of town for the other ! It’ll be done though

Evexom

And I worked 5 days and was out of town for the other ! It’ll be done though

mike_bn 2025-04-10 10:36 p.m.

I work too but cmon man

Evexom 2025-04-11 03:40 a.m.

@mike_bn

@isaac

2

stanlabs 2025-04-11 03:13 p.m.

Your honor, I hope this 2 page 200-300 word response finally made you realize why it was so utterly necessary to have 6 days to file it

User

Message could not be loaded.

stanlabs 2025-04-11 03:13 p.m.

stanlabs

Your honor, I hope this 2 page 200-300 word response finally made you realize why it was so utterly necessary to have 6 days to file it

mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:27 p.m.

next time attach my portrait to it

mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:27 p.m.

@Evexom

mike_bn

next time attach my portrait to it

Evexom 2025-04-11 03:30 p.m.

No thanks, that'd be a violation of LR4(1)

Evexom

No thanks, that'd be a violation of LR4(1)

mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:32 p.m.

Um DNC

mike_bn 2025-04-11 03:32 p.m.

Ligma

Evexom 2025-04-11 03:32 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1239483516589445162/1292747604286767134/attachment-14.gif

4

isaac 2025-04-11 09:26 p.m.

Can we move to pre-trial @mike_bn

1

isaac

Can we move to pre-trial @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:47 p.m.

pre trial to end

mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:47 p.m.

apr 21

mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:48 p.m.

discovery demand letters due apr 14

mike_bn 2025-04-11 11:48 p.m.

discovery due apr 19

mike_bn 2025-04-15 06:33 p.m.

@Evexom

@isaac

reminder

mike_bn 2025-04-15 06:33 p.m.

reminder

Evexom 2025-04-15 06:43 p.m.

send yo shit @isaac

Evexom 2025-04-15 06:43 p.m.

/s/Fliply27

isaac 2025-04-15 07:26 p.m.

SRRY

isaac 2025-04-15 07:27 p.m.

Verbal Motion to Withdraw as Counsel @mike_bn

isaac 2025-04-15 07:27 p.m.

Pls

isaac 2025-04-15 07:33 p.m.

Actually withdrawn Srry ur highness

isaac 2025-04-15 07:34 p.m.

Terms have changed

isaac 2025-04-15 07:51 p.m.

Initial Disclosures:

isaac 2025-04-15 07:52 p.m.

cc: @Evexom

@mike_bn

@stanlabs

isaac

Initial Disclosures:

stanlabs 2025-04-15 07:56 p.m.

I object

stanlabs

I object

Evexom 2025-04-15 08:01 p.m.

shutup

stanlabs 2025-04-15 08:24 p.m.

I move to contempt my attorney for humiliating me

isaac 2025-04-21 12:59 p.m.

Hi is pretrial end @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.

thank you for getting my title right

mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.

@stanlabs

@Evexom

end of today for discovery

mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:04 p.m.

ill let it slide

mike_bn 2025-04-21 01:05 p.m.

but after today u wont be submitting

stanlabs 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.

@isaac

@Luso

HI I AM DISCLOSING EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT I HAD WITH MX. INSERT

stanlabs 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.

BCC:

@mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-04-21 10:55 p.m.

I Concur

isaac 2025-04-21 10:57 p.m.

Plaintiff and his Attorney Thank the Defense for bringign up this ex-parte communication
cc: @stanlabs

stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:02 p.m.

Defense is disclosing prior ex-communication
cc: @isaac
bcc:

@turntable

@stanlabs

@Code3Patrick

stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:03 p.m.

stanlabs 2025-04-21 11:04 p.m.

@Brenda Cornwallis

Please add this ex-communications to the trello card---I have already paid the required fees

mike_bn 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.

Thank you for that

mike_bn 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.

I almost forgot

isaac 2025-04-21 11:27 p.m.

Plaintiff and his Attorney Thank the Defense for bringign up this ex-parte communication
cc: @stanlabs

isaac 2025-04-22 01:01 p.m.

Hello Is pretrial over now @mike_bn

isaac

Hello Is pretrial over now @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-04-22 02:53 p.m.

Yes

mike_bn used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.

Case Modified

@mike_bn

has added @leoisnoob to the case channel.

mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.

@leoisnoob

hi my lovely clerk

mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.

can u schedule this for trial?

mike_bn 2025-04-28 08:45 p.m.

i will be free all of next week for a discord trial

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:23 a.m.

@Evexom

@isaac

guys

Evexom 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.

Hi

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.

can we not just summary this

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:24 a.m.

if you guys want a trial ill give it to you

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:25 a.m.

the dispute here is lawfulness

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:25 a.m.

not an issue of material fact

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:28 a.m.

i have 2 other trials about to happen and this case was filed later

mike_bn 2025-05-01 12:28 a.m.

so it will be pushed to the back of the line

isaac 2025-05-01 07:41 a.m.

Hi

isaac 2025-05-01 07:44 a.m.

Yea

mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.

@Evexom

@isaac

do parties both agree to summary?

mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.

can one just file a short motion

Evexom 2025-05-02 12:29 a.m.

DEALING WITH A MONITOR THAT WENT KAPUT ILL REVIEW EVERYTHING AND FIGURE THIS OUT SHORTLY

Evexom

DEALING WITH A MONITOR THAT WENT KAPUT ILL REVIEW EVERYTHING AND FIGURE THIS OUT SHORTLY

mike_bn 2025-05-02 12:30 a.m.

WHY ARE WE YELLING

Evexom 2025-05-02 12:30 a.m.

BECAUSE IM BROKE AND I REALLY DONT WANT TO DROP MORE MONEY ON A MONITOR

isaac 2025-05-02 07:39 a.m.

Sorry I can't motion

stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.

I hate my attorney

stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.

@mike_bn

Hi I file for summary judgement

stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.

files

stanlabs 2025-05-03 06:40 p.m.

View attached image:

stanlabs

I hate my attorney

Evexom 2025-05-03 10:30 p.m.

I hate you too dw

mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.

@Evexom

@isaac

okay

mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.

do both parties agree upon summary judgement?

mike_bn 2025-05-07 10:43 p.m.

im just gonna review your pleadings and decide

mike_bn

do both parties agree upon summary judgement?

isaac 2025-05-07 10:46 p.m.

Yea

isaac 2025-05-07 10:46 p.m.

cc: @stanlabs

Evexom 2025-05-07 10:58 p.m.

ok

Evexom

ok

mike_bn 2025-05-07 11:00 p.m.

yes or no

mike_bn 2025-05-07 11:00 p.m.

IDOT

mike_bn

IDOT

Evexom 2025-05-07 11:01 p.m.

Thoughts on my environmental disaster?

mike_bn

yes or no

Evexom 2025-05-07 11:01 p.m.

yes :D

stanlabs 2025-05-07 11:34 p.m.

Arbitrator Insertreality

isaac 2025-05-08 05:55 p.m.

Hello @mike_bn When can expect a decision

stanlabs 2025-05-09 11:26 a.m.

@mike_bn

Hello Honorable

stanlabs 2025-05-09 11:27 a.m.

When can a decision be expected?

mike_bn 2025-05-09 12:40 p.m.

Idk bro I’m stuck here

isaac 2025-05-09 10:16 p.m.

THANK YOU SIR

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.

@isaac

Im prepared to dismiss this

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.

You never stated a claim to which relief can be granted

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:17 p.m.

What is the claim?

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:18 p.m.

I did not see a tort

isaac 2025-05-10 04:19 p.m.

The claim is that

isaac 2025-05-10 04:19 p.m.

So its

mike_bn

What is the claim?

isaac 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.

The claim is that luso was fired

isaac 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.

For submitting a complaint against m-span

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.

No no not the facts

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.

but the categorization of the facts which give rise to a claim

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:22 p.m.

wrongful termination isnt a tort

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

unless im mistaken

isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

Ur mistaken.

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

Ur not mistaken

isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

Cc @stanlabs

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

please correct me

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

if i am

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

Can you make the plaintiff pay my lawyer fees

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

stan stfubitch

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

isaac 2025-05-10 04:23 p.m.

The tort is wrongful termination

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

And its a tort cause i said it was a tort in the civil complaint

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

So

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Is it common law

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Yup.

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

I would say to the judge

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

It is.

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Ok

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

It's common law sir

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

???

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Oh sorry

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Are you crosstalking to me?

isaac 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

Sorry judge

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:24 p.m.

right but

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:25 p.m.

Actually WRONG!

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.

i hate our senate

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.

a lot

isaac 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.

AGREED.

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.

What's the problem

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:26 p.m.

okay you are right

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.

in that case i am entering a finding in favor of the plaintiff

isaac 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.

THANK you.

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.

i think it is more likely than not that the defendant was fired as a result of their report against defendant

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:27 p.m.

cc @isaac

@Evexom

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

ISNT THAT SECTION RELATING TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES?

isaac 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

Agreed, thank you establishing JUSTICE in this CRIMINAL community

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

HOW MUCH DO I HAVE TO PAY YOU

isaac 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

We will be calculating the payment in a moment

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

is it against gov

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

i fucking hate this senate

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

???

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

hoold on

mike_bn

i fucking hate this senate

Evexom 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

Don’t we all

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:28 p.m.

@isaac

what is your reply

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

It is against ALL peoples

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

im withdrawing my finding for a second

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

It says PEOPLE not government employees

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

THE LAW WAS CLEARLY INTENDED FOR GOV EMPLOYEES

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

the title is "Public Employment"

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

the titles doesnt matter

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

the state registar determines that

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

the senate doesnt make the titless

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

the rest of the sections are tailored towards gov

isaac 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

so that would be krabzs job

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:29 p.m.

@Evexom

reply?

mike_bn

the rest of the sections are tailored towards gov

isaac 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

that is the state registars choice

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

well i need to consider legislative intent

isaac 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

the senate didnt decide that

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

or lawmaker intent

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

since krabz isnt senate but still a lawmaker

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

Is there a bill

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

we can look at?

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

To see for any congressional findings and stuff

mike_bn 2025-05-10 04:30 p.m.

the law is quite literally titled the "Public Servants Act"

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

Ok your honor I did some digging

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

Inaugural laws of the state

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

Your Honor

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

employee rights is for PUBLIC SERVANTS

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

If you look at 4 M.S.C 7 ' 5107

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

DEFINED IN STATE LAW

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

IT STATES

mike_bn

@Evexom reply?

Evexom 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

At work rn will have one once im off. If you make these ppl shut up so I can find this

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

no person employed by the GOVERNMENT may create, maintain, orchestrate, lobby for, or organize a union

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

THAT section specifically talks abotu government employees

isaac 2025-05-10 04:31 p.m.

the rest of the sections merely say people

stanlabs

Click to see attachment.

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:32 p.m.

But the law which defines employee rights SPECIFICALLY states its given to public servants

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:32 p.m.

Just because the senate is retards and felt the need to add "government" to one statute doesn't mean it's applies to EVERY employer in the state(edited)

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:33 p.m.

that is the other statutes not specifying government employees

stanlabs

Click to see attachment.

stanlabs 2025-05-10 04:37 p.m.

@krabz

Why are DEFINITIONS not in the state code btw

stanlabs

@krabz Why are DEFINITIONS not in the state code btw

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.

That was supposed to be the original PSA. I believe mandatorymorale codified what you are reading; but it was removed when we added the (now present) edited Ridgeway PSA.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.

Hence why that entire Google document is just for reference.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-10 07:05 p.m.

Hope this helps!

stanlabs 2025-05-10 07:08 p.m.

Ok so the definition is out of the window @mike_bn

stanlabs 2025-05-10 07:08 p.m.

However legislative intent CLEARLY indicates these laws apply to public servants

isaac 2025-05-10 08:20 p.m.

The definition is not encoded therefore does NOT apply

mike_bn 2025-05-10 09:52 p.m.

Legislative intent

mike_bn 2025-05-10 09:52 p.m.

Okay I’ll write a ruling on this with case law

stanlabs 2025-05-11 12:46 a.m.

@Evexom

Fuckass lawyer do you have anything to say

Evexom 2025-05-11 12:47 a.m.

Shut up I been napping

Evexom 2025-05-11 12:47 a.m.

Bum

mike_bn

Okay I’ll write a ruling on this with case law

isaac 2025-05-11 01:05 a.m.

When can we expect this sir

Evexom 2025-05-11 01:38 a.m.

ok so what do you need a response to Mr Jew? @mike_bn

Evexom

ok so what do you need a response to Mr Jew? @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-05-11 10:29 a.m.

If the law in which plaintiff is suing for only applies to gov employees

mike_bn

If the law in which plaintiff is suing for only applies to gov employees

Evexom 2025-05-11 01:17 p.m.

The statute was made for public employment, nothing suggests that it is for private employees. If you try and use the Plaintiff argument that it also applies to the private sector is just a joke

mike_bn 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.

Im going to write a ruling on this

mike_bn 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.

Thank you senate for once again a great piece of legislation

Evexom

The statute was made for public employment, nothing suggests that it is for private employees. If you try and use the Plaintiff argument that it also applies to the private sector ...

isaac 2025-05-11 01:18 p.m.

What suggests it was made for public employment

isaac

What suggests it was made for public employment

Evexom 2025-05-11 01:19 p.m.

The fact that the statute was enacted by the Public Servants Act and not the Private Servants Act?

Evexom

The fact that the statute was enacted by the Public Servants Act and not the Private Servants Act?

isaac 2025-05-11 01:21 p.m.

I dont see any public servants act anywhere

isaac

I dont see any public servants act anywhere

Evexom 2025-05-11 01:21 p.m.

mike_bn

Thank you senate for once again a great piece of legislation

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:16 p.m.

surprisingly this was the senates fault

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:16 p.m.

this is Central Authority legislation

isaac 2025-05-11 02:45 p.m.

@mike_bn

Sir Jew, it is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when the legislature uses different language in different parts of a statute or act, that choice is intentional. The Supreme Court explained that “[w]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” See Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983), This principle directly applies here. Where the legislature has explicitly limited certain statutes to “government employees” or “public servants” and used more general terms like “employees” or “persons” in others, the only reasonable inference is that it meant to draw a distinction in coverage.

The statutory language at issue is clear and unqualified. As the Supreme Court held in Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249, 253–54 (1992), “when the words of a statute are unambiguous, then, this first canon [of statutory construction] is also the last: ‘judicial inquiry is complete.’” The legislature did not include any language restricting the statute’s applicability to the public sector, and it is not the role of the Court to read such a limitation into the text.

The omission of qualifying language especially when such language appears in related statutes does reflect a deliberate legislative choice. This Court should give effect to that choice and recognize that the protections or obligations imposed by the statute apply broadly, including to private sector employees.

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:53 p.m.

if the court recognizes and accepts this arguement, then the court, by the Mayflower State Constitution, must declare several provisions of the law to be unconstitutional(edited)

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:53 p.m.

stanlabs

if the court recognizes and accepts this arguement, then the court, by the Mayflower State Constitution, must declare several provisions of the law to be unconstitutional(edited)

isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

no? it simply interprets the statue according to its PLAIN language

isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

as the legislature intended

stanlabs

Click to see attachment.

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

The bill in question is the Public Servants Act

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

STOP CROSST ALKING TOME

isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

without limiting the scope beyond what is written

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

STOP CROSS TALKING TO ME

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

STOP TALKING TO ME

isaac 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

??????

isaac

no? it simply interprets the statue according to its PLAIN language

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

Yes

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

And I'm saying if we do that

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

Then under the one-subject rule Mayflower follows

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:54 p.m.

the provisions would be unconstitutional

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.

since it goes outside the subject of public servants and into the prviate sector

isaac 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.

any challenge to the laws constitutionally can be addressed SEPARATELY

isaac 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.

it is the courts duty to interpet the statue faithfully before reaching constitutional questions

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:55 p.m.

Ok I'm just putting it on the record!

isaac 2025-05-11 02:56 p.m.

Thanks hoe

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:56 p.m.

@Evexom

Idiot any thoughts?

Evexom 2025-05-11 02:57 p.m.

@mike_bn

Can we get a gag order on these two until you publish your ruling?

isaac 2025-05-11 02:57 p.m.

?????? Sir I made a VALID and LEGAL argument above before i was cross-talked by stanlabs

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.

Ur cross talking rn

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.

I would say to the judge

stanlabs 2025-05-11 02:58 p.m.

In reference to Filturaes

mike_bn 2025-05-11 04:37 p.m.

Everyone who cross talks is getting raped

isaac 2025-05-11 05:34 p.m.

AGREED, SIR.

stanlabs 2025-05-13 07:19 p.m.

@mike_bn

Hello order please

stanlabs 2025-05-13 07:20 p.m.

What's the et—

isaac 2025-05-13 07:20 p.m.

A!

stanlabs

What's the et—

mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.

Kys

mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.

Jk

mike_bn 2025-05-13 07:39 p.m.

Let me do stuff

mike_bn

Kys

stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:08 p.m.

Recuse urself

stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.

Also you're a hypocrite btw

stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.

Ur chamber rules explicitly say i can call you whatever i want

stanlabs 2025-05-13 11:09 p.m.

But when I kept on calling you bitch, you said you would contempt me?

stanlabs

But when I kept on calling you bitch, you said you would contempt me?

mike_bn 2025-05-14 01:07 a.m.

I felt mysterious

isaac 2025-05-14 08:38 p.m.

HELLO ALL

2

2

2

isaac

HELLO ALL

stanlabs 2025-05-15 10:49 p.m.

The defense would like to motion to the court that the case be dismissed w/ prejudice as a form of sanction against the plaintiff. As seen above, by saying "ALL," the plaintiff is cross-talking to the defense.

mike_bn 2025-05-16 10:32 a.m.

@isaac

@Evexom

im going to do ruling soon

mike_bn 2025-05-16 10:32 a.m.

thank god u have no right to speedy

mike_bn

@isaac

@Evexom im going to do ruling soon

isaac 2025-05-16 03:00 p.m.

We invoke our right to a speedy trial

isaac 2025-05-16 03:00 p.m.

And to a JURY TRIAL

isaac 2025-05-16 03:01 p.m.

cause u are BIASED

isaac

cause u are BIASED

Evexom 2025-05-16 03:07 p.m.

Are you trying to say the Jews run the media?

Evexom

Are you trying to say the Jews run the media?

isaac 2025-05-16 03:09 p.m.

Sir Stanley Labson is a White Ukranian Man

stanlabs 2025-05-17 09:57 p.m.

@mike_bn

HELP

isaac 2025-05-17 09:59 p.m.

May it please the court,

isaac 2025-05-17 09:59 p.m.

I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices.

stanlabs 2025-05-18 09:50 p.m.

@mike_bn

stanlabs 2025-05-18 09:50 p.m.

mike_bn 2025-05-19 08:35 a.m.

isaac 2025-05-20 10:42 p.m.

@mike_bn

Hello me and @stanlabs (specifically him) would like to know when we will be getting a ruling

stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:58 p.m.

Filturaes, as Insert has said before, we do not have a right to a speedy trial

stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:58 p.m.

—And that's a good thing.

stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.

We should trust the Honorable Judge Insertreality to take into factor all of the details of the case

stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.

And in order to do so, we must give him the time that he needs to research and deliberate.

stanlabs 2025-05-20 10:59 p.m.

You can't rush justice @isaac.

Evexom 2025-05-20 11:25 p.m.

@mike_bn

Mr Bergstein this ruling was promised to us 3000 years ago

mike_bn 2025-05-21 01:56 a.m.

mike_bn 2025-05-21 01:58 a.m.

Tomorrow

isaac 2025-05-21 03:24 p.m.

GREAT

stanlabs 2025-05-21 10:45 p.m.

@mike_bn

NOT GREAT!

stanlabs 2025-05-21 10:45 p.m.

TODAY IS TOMORROW

mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.

Bruhhhh

mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.

Ok u want paper ruling

mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.

Or I can just tell you my decision

mike_bn 2025-05-22 12:21 p.m.

Paper is halfway done

mike_bn

Or I can just tell you my decision

stanlabs 2025-05-22 12:30 p.m.

Tell decision now

mike_bn

Or I can just tell you my decision

isaac 2025-05-22 02:39 p.m.

Paperless if it's in our favor

isaac 2025-05-22 02:39 p.m.

Cc: @stanlabs

isaac

Paperless if it's in our favor

stanlabs 2025-05-22 04:41 p.m.

Hey have you noticed how he hasn't given a paperless ruling

stanlabs 2025-05-22 04:41 p.m.

Not looking good for you

isaac 2025-05-22 04:54 p.m.

Ok paperless in general

isaac 2025-05-22 04:55 p.m.

cc: @mike_bn

Evexom 2025-05-23 02:08 a.m.

Hey jewstein when ruling @mike_bn

Evexom

Hey jewstein when ruling @mike_bn

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:12 a.m.

I’m on another vacation so I don’t have PC

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:13 a.m.

However I do agree with the defense that these statutes are designed for government employees

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:13 a.m.

That’s what the legislature intended here

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:14 a.m.

So I’m going to dismiss this

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:14 a.m.

@Evexom

@isaac

mike_bn 2025-05-23 09:15 a.m.

If you want to wait for a paper ruling I can do it when I’m back

isaac 2025-05-23 10:53 a.m.

It's ok

stanlabs 2025-05-23 10:59 a.m.

Oh god

stanlabs 2025-05-23 10:59 a.m.

@isaac

Settle out of court?

stanlabs

@isaac Settle out of court?

isaac 2025-05-23 12:23 p.m.

? It's dismissed idiot

isaac

? It's dismissed idiot

stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:37 p.m.

Idiot you just turned down free money

stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:37 p.m.

@mike_bn

Can the plaintiff pay the defense's attorney fees

stanlabs

@mike_bn Can the plaintiff pay the defense's attorney fees

isaac 2025-05-23 05:52 p.m.

? Floppy is a horrible attorney

isaac 2025-05-23 05:53 p.m.

We the Plaintiff request $200,000 for lost wages or we are suing again @stanlabs

isaac

We the Plaintiff request $200,000 for lost wages or we are suing again @stanlabs

stanlabs 2025-05-23 05:57 p.m.

REMINDER:

The doctrine of respondeat superior and the doctrine of negligent entrustment are simply alternative theories by which to impute an employee's negligence to an employer. Under either theory, the liability of the principal is dependent on the negligence of the agent.

stanlabs

REMINDER: The doctrine of respondeat superior and the doctrine of negligent entrustment are simply alternative theories by which to impute an employee's negligence to an employe...

isaac 2025-05-23 06:04 p.m.

? What does this have to do with this

isaac

? Floppy is a horrible attorney

Evexom 2025-05-23 06:51 p.m.

kys

Evexom 2025-05-23 06:51 p.m.

(keep yourself safe)

isaac 2025-05-23 07:22 p.m.

i demand CIVIL. yes. CIVIL contempt

isaac

? Floppy is a horrible attorney

stanlabs 2025-05-23 07:27 p.m.

Aren't you the attorney that's going after your fellow colleague Vohesia?

stanlabs

Aren't you the attorney that's going after your fellow colleague Vohesia?

isaac 2025-05-23 07:37 p.m.

? Mandatorymorale?

stanlabs 2025-05-23 07:37 p.m.

No Vohesia

isaac 2025-05-23 07:38 p.m.

Who is that

mike_bn 2025-05-25 05:20 p.m.

@Brenda Cornwallis

u can dismiss w prej

Brenda Cornwallis used

/transcript

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-25 05:25 p.m.

Initial transcript w/ images failed. Retrying without the images..(edited)

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-25 05:25 p.m.

https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1376310267658502254 Successfully created transcript.

isaac 2025-05-25 05:54 p.m.

@mike_bn

WE ARE APEPALING!

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 08:30 p.m.

Unable to upload transcript. An unknown error has occurred.

Exported 430 messages